Saturday, 3 March 2012

THE PHILOSOPHY OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION OF MAN

         FRIENDRICH-VON-SCHILLER


                  Broadly i personally defined, Aesthetics inform us about what is worth our time and interest in Beauty and Art, or in life in general through his research. For Schiller, it is the Aesthetic that everyone should come to allow the arrival of the true republic in which human beings as "not offend the freedom of others to confirm he had no dignity to throw to show mercy." Heart is important to make something beautiful like the writer said. Kantian system was invented by Immanuel Kant showed that some philosophers do not agree with the practical part, but they never do so. Schiller felt that just because their position will produce a different idea as others if their position stripped. According to him, the formal rules are better if taken from the inside instead of writing or of their own personal experiences in the world. Philosophers prefer to bow to their own weaknesses better than staying power borrowed and foreign support has become an issue. If indeed appear in the analysis report as a paradox, Schiller would argue that people do not recognize their own natural sense of what makes allies. He then began talking about the freedom to do what he wants.

                   Schiller discusses the time spent for people in everyday life in his second letter. He was less confident to use the freedom given to him. He also talked about the issues people need to spend his life for themselves as other countries do. Human should be given the freedom to express pent up their minds. Schiller afraid of the interest that is building the world will not involve themselves with the most perfect art, that people will be more concern about the status and position from the quality. Arts need to improve himself in the industry over the needs of the people because art is the daughter of freedom. In Vanity Fair, the spiritual service of art has no effect on them because people will take pride in appearance and ability. Philosophical imagination steal a promise after the other and smaller obstacles and limitations of science of art has been enlarged. The main focus has been given to the political arena by the philosophers as it is a place where they believe that the fate of great mankind to be decided. I think that politic have a bigger power to control community.

                    Human cannot act for the first time as long as  nature acts for  their independent intelligent criteria. In addition, countries were forced to be exposed to all human needs. But, people often are not satisfied with the laws so he shakes off  enacted by the spontaneous action. He had started with a clear vision and determination that will restore access as maturity  nature to recover his chillhood. Unfortunately at that time, the authorities are very firm but has no authority for  working blind. To work with the blind, who do not have the authority and independence to the bow of work to be done to adapt. Schiller plans to seek some support to continue the relationship without knowing the real situation of society they want to abolish them. But for those that still exist on this earth, the state raised the issue of repair. Appropriate support will not find the original character of human.

                    The author, Schiller said the only one who can guarantee the life through the influence of character can complete the transformation of the door without harming the moral principles. However, no physical force that could change the human personality because people will always live without the expected and uncertain. Unity can not be changed because it is large or the existence of the obligation to harmonize every human being who has the determination. He wrote that at the same time refer to a friend written Fichte: Lectures on Call directory. Now the man can be opposed to itself by means of a two-fold: either as a savage, when his feelings rule over principle, or as a barbarian, when his principles destroy his feelings. Violent hate art, and recognize nature as his despotic ruler barbarian laughs at nature, and dishonours, but he always walked with a more despicable than violence, to be a slave senses. Male plants to be his friend, and praise of friendship, while only bridling yang.Consequently of  joke, he should not injure the manifold in the natural moral reason to bring unity into physical society. Successful is the same form away from uniformity and confusion when trying to maintain the character of nature manifold in the moral structure of society, this does not need to make any breach in moral unity. He also questioned whether the man will be blamed if neglecting their honor?

                       People need to wake up from a long lethargy and self-deception. In the opinion of Schiller, of all parties to seize by force, no longer claim they were unjustly confiscated. Hope is in vain when the shaky nature, the foundations shake, tribute to the man at length as a goal, to make the basic right of freedom of political union. we deny the features in the legal and moral taste and cruelty in the field at the same time against the notion to accept the principle. This is because if the world will not have love for humanity and without loss of judgment and of course cannot judge the beauty and art. Besides that the reason the request is to improve our humanity and to create lasting beauty.

                                                   (^_^)....(^_^)

1 comment:

  1. Despite being fuzzy, you have at least completed this task, well-done!

    ReplyDelete